Relic icon or hoax carbon dating the turin shroud

Stay out of school.”—David Mamet (TRUE AND FALSE, BAMBI VS. “Reg Hartt’s thoughts are always close to my heart.”—Chuck Jones. As a Buddhist that is the highest compliment I can pay.”—Jerzy Zaborski (Flame after his name to indicate rank). Garza-Valdes took the artifact to the radiocarbon dating lab at the University of Arizona. The carving style, however, suggested that the age should have been about 200 B. If a bioplastic-polymer, for that is what it seemed to be, had been forming over many centuries, it would result in a mixture of older and newer material.

Gove&f=false In it he states repeatedly that he was blocked by THE SHROUD OF TURIN RESEARCH PROJECT (S. Could human blood remnants that contain a man’s DNA be traces of the blood of Jesus? He was curious about a lacquer-like coating on the object and speculated might have been produced by bacteria.

It was thought by Egyptologists to have been from the Hawara excavation site in central Egypt. There was a pair of decorated gold nipple covers, the sort used for females.

relic icon or hoax carbon dating the turin shroud-10relic icon or hoax carbon dating the turin shroud-61

When researchers at the museum carbon dated bone pieces and pieces of the linen wrappings they found extraordinarily different dates. seemingly with validity, that the sheen was off the carbon dating of the shroud. al., were proven wrong, there was reason for reasonable doubt. Sheler, writing in the July 24, 2000, issue of , quotes Gove as saying, There is a bioplastic coating on some threads, maybe most.” Gove goes on to say that if there is a sufficient quantity of bioplastic it “would make the fabric sample seem younger than it should be.

Garza-Valdes had said: With a scanning electron microscope, I found the fibers were completely covered by the bioplastic coating (polyhydroxyalkanoate) and by many colonies of fungi which usually thrive on this polymer…

Many scientists found this last statement flawed because: Because a bioplastic material could be easily detected, fibers from the shroud were examined at the National Science Foundation Mass Spectrometry Center of Excellence at the University of Nebraska.

Pyrolysis-mass-spectrometry failed to detect any form of bioplastic polymer on fibers.

Just to make sure, laser-microprobe Raman analysis at Instruments SA, Inc. This method also failed to detect any bioplastic polymer. The Shroud of Turin is a rectangular linen sheet, ~4.4 metres long by ~1.1 metres wide (~14.3 x ~3.6 feet), and about a third of a millimetre (~0.34 mm) thick.

Leave a Reply